www.hoop-math.com

College basketball play-by-play statistics

North Dakota: 2010-2011

Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013

Player

FGA

TS%

%Shots at Rim

FG% at Rim

%Assisted at Rim

%Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

%Assisted 2pt Jumpers

%Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

%assisted 3pt

FTA/FGA

FT%

Troy Huff

239

0.453

41%

55%

33%

27%

23%

7%

32%

28%

71%

0.36

61%

Jamal Webb

201

0.534

41%

55%

11%

22%

34%

7%

37%

39%

76%

0.23

63%

Patrick Mitchell

190

0.558

20%

61%

74%

29%

41%

43%

51%

39%

95%

0.41

65%

Josh Schuler

190

0.572

13%

71%

18%

44%

40%

15%

43%

40%

79%

0.38

77%

Aaron Anderson

129

0.500

34%

48%

10%

36%

26%

0%

29%

26%

90%

0.81

79%

Brandon Brekke

79

0.680

61%

71%

68%

39%

61%

47%

0%

---

---

0.48

68%

Derek Benter

79

0.489

38%

53%

69%

52%

32%

54%

10%

25%

50%

0.62

73%

Jordan Allard

59

0.485

29%

65%

55%

47%

46%

23%

24%

7%

100%

0.51

67%

Chris Clausen

49

0.464

27%

54%

14%

16%

25%

0%

57%

29%

62%

0.35

65%

Spencer Goodman

33

0.439

27%

33%

0%

18%

50%

33%

55%

22%

75%

0.36

83%

Nick Haugen

21

0.476

14%

33%

100%

43%

33%

33%

43%

44%

25%

0.00

---

Doug Archer

9

0.476

22%

100%

50%

67%

17%

0%

11%

0%

---

1.33

67%

Mitch Wilmer

9

0.618

22%

50%

100%

78%

57%

25%

0%

---

---

1.11

70%

Mike Mathison

7

0.415

29%

50%

100%

29%

0%

---

43%

33%

100%

0.43

67%

Dan Stockdale

5

0.200

0%

---

---

80%

25%

100%

20%

0%

---

0.00

---

TEAM

1299

0.521

32%

57%

38%

34%

36%

25%

34%

33%

79%

0.43

70%

Team Defensive Summary

Shot Type

% of shots

FG%

% of Shots Blocked

Unblocked FG%

At Rim

30%

60%

10%

66%

2pt Jumpers

38%

38%

7%

40%

3pt Shots

32%

34%

1%

35%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Offense

This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

12%

65%

53%

71%

17%

29%

30%

49%

Rebound, 11-35 s

24%

45%

25%

52%

37%

38%

38%

32%

Opp score, 0-10 s

4%

45%

33%

71%

26%

27%

40%

24%

Opp score, 11-35 s

41%

44%

26%

55%

33%

34%

41%

30%

Steal, 0-10 s

7%

72%

65%

85%

18%

62%

18%

23%

Steal, 11-35 s

3%

35%

27%

43%

46%

25%

27%

29%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

2%

67%

33%

62%

25%

83%

42%

40%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

7%

51%

34%

50%

33%

43%

33%

39%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Defense

This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against NORTH DAKOTA.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

13%

54%

42%

55%

15%

45%

43%

38%

Rebound, 11-35 s

23%

45%

29%

52%

42%

36%

30%

34%

Opp score, 0-10 s

6%

63%

43%

63%

24%

60%

33%

43%

Opp score, 11-35 s

39%

44%

21%

64%

43%

34%

36%

31%

Steal, 0-10 s

7%

60%

49%

71%

23%

67%

27%

24%

Steal, 11-35 s

2%

40%

20%

50%

55%

27%

25%

40%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

1%

53%

20%

100%

47%

29%

33%

40%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

8%

49%

27%

59%

41%

45%

32%

31%

Updated 2012-10-26